Another major change proposed in the juvenile justice bill would give more authority for intake officers to resolve cases before they are sent to court. Currently juvenile services intake officers must forward all felony cases to the State’s Attorney’s Office. The State then has 30 days to decide whether to file a juvenile delinquency petition in the appropriate circuit court. In contrast, a juvenile intake officer may resolve a misdemeanor by closing the case with a warning or offering informal supervision. Misdemeanor cases would still be able to be filed in the circuit court if the State or the victim objects to the intake officer’s decision. This is a long overdue modification, as it is a major waste of resources to set juvenile cases for intake hearings if there is no chance the case can be resolved. Intake hearings for felony cases are currently futile, as the officer’s hands are tied. Rather than keep a blanket provision that strips the intake officers of power to do their job, the legislature is moving toward trusting the officers to make a decision on a case-by-case basis. There are limitations on this proposal however, as intake officers would still have to forward all felony crimes of violence to the State, as well as cases where the allegation is causing or attempting to cause death or physical injury to another. The physical injury terminology may have to be revised to reflect serious bodily injury though, as physical injury is a rather general term.
The bill also adds a provision that allows the State and the defense to hold delinquency proceedings in abeyance in favor of a term of informal adjustment. If the State and defense agree, the child may have the ability to complete certain conditions and then be awarded with a dismissal of the delinquency petition. This type of diversionary track has traditionally been accomplished by way of a STET, but establishing an official system to avoid adjudications going on a juvenile’s record is a welcomed tool. Other new provisions include reducing the time between detention hearings for all juveniles held to every 14 days instead of every 25 days, and barring juveniles from being sent to out-of-home placements if the most serious charge is a misdemeanor or on a technical violation of probation. Firearm offenses would be the exception to this provision, and may still result in placement out of the home.
It appears the legislature has declined to review state law regarding the original jurisdiction of juvenile court versus adult court. For now, all juveniles ages 16 and 17 will continue to be arrested and charged as adults for offenses such as armed robbery and assault in the first degree. The Blog will continue to follow this impactful legislation, and may post a follow up article in the future when the final bill is approved by the General Assembly. If your child has been charged with a crime contact Maryland juvenile defense lawyer Benjamin Herbst anytime for a free consultation. Benjamin has successfully defended numerous juveniles charged with crimes ranging from underaged drinking, theft and drug possession to robbery and attempted murder. He fights tooth and nail to protect the futures of all his juvenile clients, and does everything in his power to make sure they don’t spend time behind barbed wire fences away from their families. Contact Benjamin today for representation at intake hearings or in juvenile court. Benjamin also represents juveniles who are under investigation, and makes sure police do not use their authority to take illegal statements.
Resources:
Maryland juvenile justice reform bill passes state Senate, wtop.com.
Senate bill 691, magleg.maryland.gov.