The supporting ATF agents stormed on scene and ordered the two robbers to drop their weapons and put their hands in the air, but instead they both took off running. After a quick pursuit both suspects were placed in custody, though one was actually shot by the ATF as he attempted to flea. Only one of the guns was recovered, but as part of the plea agreement both men admitted that there were two guns involved in the attempted robbery. The latest defendant to plea guilty was convicted of assault on a federal officer and brandishing a firearm in the course of a crime of violence. This 33-year old defendant faces between 7 and 15 years in federal prison followed by supervised release. The second defendant entered his plea the week before, and both are scheduled to be sentenced in March in the Baltimore federal courthouse.
Although both defendants admitted they had no idea their victims were federal agents, there is no element of knowledge for the crime of assault on a federal law enforcement officer in the U.S. code. The government is only required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim was in fact a federal officer acting in the course of his or her duties. This is different than some jurisdictions that require that the defendant knew or should have known the victim was a law enforcement officer. Law enforcement officers are generally afforded an additional layer of protection against assault through enhanced penalties, and the federal system is no exception. While simple assault on a federal agent is punishable by 1 year in prison, if the assault took place during the course of a felony the maximum becomes 8 years. There is no element of injury required for this offense, so in this case an attempted robbery with no actual physical contact was more than enough to satisfy the elements of the crime.
Under Maryland law the crimes of robbery and attempted robbery fall under the same statute, and for the purposes of sentencing it is irrelevant whether the defendant was actually successful in stealing anything. There is a separate statute for robbery with a dangerous weapon (also known as armed robbery) that carries a higher sentence 20 years compared to 15 without a weapon. On the contrary federal law does not have a general statute prohibiting robbery, which could have been why these defendants pled to the charges mentioned above (it could have also been part of the plea negotiations). Federal law has specific statutes regarding bank robbery, postal robbery and robbery of property belonging to the United States, though there is no a catchall robbery statute. Robbery of government property has a maximum penalty of 10 years and if a dangerous weapon is used the max becomes 25 years. The government likely could have proved the $2,000 cash involved in the deal belonged to the United States though but the plea deal mate it a moot point.
The Blog will continue to post articles about federal crimes in the Baltimore area, and will offer commentary on the difference between state and federal laws. If you or a loved one has been charged with a crime in Maryland contact robbery attorney Benjamin Herbst at 410-207-2598. Benjamin handles all criminal cases including theft, assault and gun crimes, and is available anytime for a free consultation.
Resources
Baltimore Man Pleads Guilty to Attempting to Rob Undercover ATF Special Agents at Gunpoint During a Purported Drug Deal, justice.gov.